acf domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /var/www/vhosts/studiogo.tech/httpdocs/upcloudold/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6131all-in-one-wp-migration domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /var/www/vhosts/studiogo.tech/httpdocs/upcloudold/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6131rocket domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /var/www/vhosts/studiogo.tech/httpdocs/upcloudold/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6131Before plunging into the deep end with cloud server comparison, let’s take a look at how each of the server types operates. VPS<\/strong> clients get a share of a physical server for a number of hardware resources they’ve paid for, and multiple clients often share one physical host machine. From the client’s perspective a VPS barely differs from a dedicated server with a comparable low to mid-range configuration, but thanks to the virtualization layer, the service provider can maintain a uniform range of host hardware while offering multiple different virtual server configurations, which then, in turn, translates to a wider range of server options and lower prices than with dedicated servers.<\/p>\n Cloud servers<\/strong><\/a> are often confused with the VPS, as both are based on virtualization and come with many of the same advantages. Much of the definition, however, depends on the particular host provider. We at UpCloud have taken cloud computing to another level by creating a distinctly different virtualized environment. In dedicated servers and most virtual private servers, the storage disks and the processing power are all on one physical host machine, but with UpCloud the storage backend and the compute nodes are run separately. This provides many advantages such as easy\u00a0scalability and redundancy\u00a0through automation\u00a0over the traditional virtualization platforms while still guaranteeing a highly competitive\u00a0performance and\u00a0pricing<\/a>. In short – this is our definition of a cloud server regarding the technical backend.<\/p>\n With the basic knowledge of how these server models are built, we have the basis to compare them in performance. For our comparisons, we used an online benchmarking service at serverbear.com, which operated a benchmark site for many years hosting test results from a wide range of server providers\u00a0but has since unfortunately been discontinued. ServerBear utilized an open source tool called UnixBench, that runs a thorough test of the computing performance. ServerBear also used other methods to understand the I\/O performance and network speed, for example.<\/p>\n The\u00a0first comparison<\/strong> is between a mid-range dedicated server Dell R210 from LeaseWeb and UpCloud 4GB\/4CPU preconfigured instance. These two were chosen due to their similar system specifications, both running a single CPU with 4 cores and 4 GB of RAM, both are also fairly closely priced.<\/p>\n
\nDedicated servers<\/a><\/strong> offer close to metal implementation with little overhead, and they’ve been traditionally the go-to-solution for high performance demanding tasks. As the name implies, each server is dedicated privately to one client. The customer receives access to a physical server with the agreed upon hardware specifications, processing and storage, all in one unit.<\/p>\nCloud server comparison<\/h2>\n